By Jon Boyle
MOSCOW, Feb 8 (Reuters) -
Influential former U.S. senator Sam Nunn urged Moscow and Washington on
Friday to quickly flesh out their new relationship or see their improved
ties eroded by disputes over Iran and Iraq.
After a four-month honeymoon born of Moscow's stalwart support for
the U.S. war on terrorism, underlying strains are re-emerging -- witness
Russian outrage at a new CIA report accusing Moscow of helping spread
weapons of mass destruction.
Late on Thursday, Russia's Foreign Ministry branded as
"categorically unacceptable" a declassified agency report
which said Russia was still selling sensitive missile and nuclear
know-how that helped Tehran's nuclear weapons programme.
"If we do not have some meat on the bones in the next six
months, no matter what the personal relationship between our two leaders
may be, I think these problems...as well as others, will start gnawing
away at the relationship," Nunn told reporters.
Nunn was in Moscow to mark the office opening of the Nuclear Threat
Initiative, a private foundation funded by U.S. media magnate and
CNN-founder Ted Turner. It aims to reduce the risk of weapons of mass
destruction spreading.
He said tensions had been fuelled by last December's decision by U.S.
President George W. Bush to withdraw from the 1972 ABM arms control
treaty, and the Pentagon's reluctance to destroy warheads to be removed
under a new nuclear arms deal.
"Those two features are not assets in forming a partnership. But
those two points (and) arms sales to the Iranians, disagreements over
Iraq... loom much larger if we don't have the strategic framework."
Despite all the bonhomie at last November's summit between Bush and
Russian President Vladimir Putin, senior staffers were way behind their
leaders with concrete programmes that could "institutionalise the
relationship," he said.
SECURITY RELATIONSHIP
Igor Sergeyev, advisor to President Vladimir Putin on strategic
stablity, told Friday's Nezavisimaya Military Review he hoped a binding
accord lowering nuclear arms ceilings would be ready in time for a May
presidential summit in Moscow.
But he repeated Russia's insistence on the need for a legally-binding
document. "Otherwise in the field of strategic stability we will
have no guarantees whatsoever."
Russian concerns were again evident on Thursday, when Yuri Koptyev,
head of Russian Space Agency, who told state television during a tour of
a factory destroying Cold War era "Black Satan" ballistic
missiles, Moscow might yet backtrack on arsenal cuts.
"We cannot rule out that in the near future, in view of changes
in the political situation and new realities, initial plans could be
changed, not just in terms of keeping existing rocket systems until the
end of their service life, but also the rate of deployment of new
systems."
RUSSIAN OUTRAGE
Moscow's mounting frustrations boiled over on Thursday when the
Foreign Ministry issued a scorching statement lambasting a CIA report.
It said Moscow continued to supply Iran, India, China and Libya with
ballistic missile goods and know-how, adding that "monitoring
Russian proliferation behaviour... will remain a very high
priority." Any Russian aid that furthered Iran's nuclear weapons
programme would be closely scrutinised, it said.
"The Russian government's commitment, willingness and ability to
curb proliferation-related transfers remain uncertain," added the
CIA report. That sparked "not just extreme bewilderment but serious
concern" from the Foreign Ministry, given tighter export controls
were introduced in 1999.
The ministry said it would demand an explanation at ongoing
U.S.-Russian security talks.