Washington
Post - 07.15.2001
The Washington
Post
Walking a Dangerous Road to Peace
Hard Issues Remain for Mediators in Conflict Between Armenia and
Azerbaijan
By John Ward Anderson
EAST OF FIZULI, Azerbaijan -- Generally speaking, walking through a
minefield is not the preferred way to get from Point A to Point B.
But for a delegation of U.S., Russian and French peace negotiators
trying to end 13 years of conflict between Azerbaijan and Armenia, the 2
1/2-mile march through a heavily mined no man's land separating the two
combatants was more than just an exercise in getting to the other side.
"If there are new hostilities, this is the most likely place
where fighting will break out," said Carey Cavanaugh, a
troubleshooting U.S. ambassador with a theatric flair who is a
co-chairman of the three-nation mediating group. "We are very
concerned about . . . recent saber rattling. We think it's
irresponsible. We see no way further hostilities will advance peace in
this region, and we deliberately crossed here to shine the international
spotlight on that."
The conflict between the former Soviet republics of Azerbaijan and
Armenia revolves around control of Nagorno-Karabakh, a remote
mountainous enclave inside Azerbaijan that is populated principally by
ethnic Armenians who want to become either independent or a part of
Armenia.
The mediation effort has made significant headway since the beginning
of this year in brokering a final peace -- details of which are closely
guarded. The presidents of the two countries have agreed to about 80
percent of an armistice -- including one of the most politically
sensitive issues, the final status of Nagorno-Karabakh -- but several
contentious issues remain, negotiators said. The effort has been
complicated by recent calls in Azerbaijan to consider renewed military
action.
"Nobody wants to resume military action," Nikolai Gribkov,
the Russian co-chairman of the mediating group, told a group of
Azerbaijani lawmakers in the capital, Baku. "It's easy to start a
war, but it's very difficult to stop it. We've had a war in Chechnya for
six years, and there's no way we want you to suffer that."
Fighting, which killed about 30,000 people, peaked following the 1991
collapse of the Soviet Union, when Armenian troops seized
Nagorno-Karabakh and hundreds of square miles of Azerbaijani territory
surrounding it, occupying a large swath of Azerbaijan. Russia helped
negotiate a cease-fire in 1994, but about 100 people a year are still
killed by snipers and land mines near the line of control.
The mediation effort has a highly unusual level of personal
involvement by the presidents of the United States, France and Russia,
each of whom has met with his Armenian and Azerbaijani counterparts in
recent months to prod the process ahead and urge a spirit of compromise.
President Bush met separately with the leaders -- Robert Kocharian of
Armenia and Heydar Aliyev of Azerbaijan -- in Washington in April after
a four-day, U.S.-sponsored round of negotiations in Key West, Fla.
Wednesday's minefield crossing was part of the effort to keep the two
presidents from backtracking on the progress they made in Florida in the
face of strong opposition to compromise by their intensely proud and
nationalistic citizens.
White flak jacket around his torso, freshly painted green helmet atop
his head and garment bag slung over his shoulder, Cavanaugh stepped
gingerly along the path, pointing to spots where mines had been
excavated earlier that day for the passage. "We're the first
foreigners in this area since the fighting stopped" about eight
years ago, he said. "Nobody's crossed here in years. They'll
re-mine as soon as we're across."
Insisting on walking across the line of control ensured that the
14-member negotiating team flew over and drove through a wide swath of
Azerbaijan that is occupied by Armenia. What the group saw was complete
destruction: mile after mile of razed villages, destroyed farms and
factories, and overgrown fields and vineyards speckled with broken grain
silos and rusted water tanks.
Artillery barrages caused much of the ruin in the early 1990s, and
other damage was from people who stripped the land of anything useful to
take with them. What is left now here and in much of the occupied
territories, members of the mediation group said, is essentially a
tear-down civilization, blanketed over several hundred square miles,
that will have to be almost completely rebuilt, at a cost of hundreds of
millions of dollars.
There were occasional signs that Armenian civilians were farming the
region, which is supposed to be occupied only by soldiers. Settlements
in the occupied territory could complicate negotiations and the eventual
return of about 750,000 Azerbaijanis who fled the area almost a decade
ago and now live in refugee camps scattered around Azerbaijan.
Beyond humanitarian concerns, the conflict has been elevated on the
international agenda for several reasons. France and particularly the
United States have large and politically powerful Armenian populations
and lobbies pushing for a resolution. Azerbaijan and Armenia are
sandwiched among Russia, Turkey and Iran, and any renewed hostilities
could draw in those powers on opposing sides, with Russia supporting
Armenia and Azerbaijan backed by Iran and Turkey, a NATO country.
Both countries receive massive amounts of international aid because
their economies have been strangled by war-related blockades and
sanctions that probably will be lifted only after a final peace is
sealed. They lie just west of oil-rich Central Asia and the Caspian Sea,
and many plans for pipelines to the west call for oil and gas to be
transported across or near their borders. Also, political analysts say
that Azerbaijani leader Aliyev, 78 and in failing health, is eager to
settle the conflict to boost the succession chances for his son, Ilham.
Some of those issues are what originally prompted more intense,
face-to-face negotiations between Kocharian and Aliyev, who have met 16
times since the spring of 1999 trying to bridge their differences.
During those talks, according to a diplomat familiar with their
meetings, they developed "enough of a rapport to flush out what
kinds of things might be possible," and at the Key West sessions,
ideas and issues were committed to paper.
Vardan Oskanian, Armenia's foreign minister, said time was running
out, because both Armenia and Azerbaijan have presidential elections
scheduled for the spring of 2002, and "early January of next year
will be election time already. Everything will be so political it will
be impossible" to finalize a peace plan.
Negotiators met with both presidents last week to help refine some
proposals, they said, and to encourage them to prepare their people for
compromise. They refused to say what has been agreed to so far.
Azerbaijanis are adamant that Nagorno-Karabakh, which during Soviet
times was about 75 percent Armenian, remains part of their country but
said it would be granted full autonomy. People in Nagorno-Karabakh and
Armenia say the region is part of Azerbaijan only because it was ordered
to become so in the 1920s by Soviet dictator Joseph Stalin. They demand
that Nagorno-Karabakh have equal status with Azerbaijan and not be under
the Azerbaijani government.
"Karabakh will never be part of Azerbaijan," declared Col.
Avsharyan Eduard Mkhitar of the armed forces of Karabakh, who commands a
tank unit with several dozen Soviet-made T-72 tanks. "Karabakh can
and must be united with Armenia."
Other apparently unresolved issues include the status of Shusha, a
mountain town overlooking Stepanakert, Nagorno-Karabakh's capital, which
Christian Armenians and Muslim Azerbaijanis both claim as a religious
and cultural center. And it seems likely that there will have to be some
sort of corridor exchange: Armenians want free passage between their
country and Nagorno-Karabakh -- preserving the existing Lachin corridor
-- and Azerbaijanis want free passage from the main part of their
country to Nakhichevan, a small province in the west near Turkey that is
completely separated from Azerbaijan by a 20-mile-wide stretch of
Armenia. It, too, is a Stalin-era peculiarity.
"The issues that remain are vexing -- surmountable, but
hard," said Cavanaugh, the U.S. negotiator. "Almost every
problem in the Middle East is replicated here: disputes over a holy
historic and cultural center, illegal settlers in occupied areas,
questions about status and sovereignty and the return of refugees."
The Middle East is also instructive, he said, because public
negotiations have enabled critics to attack proposals they don't like
before an entire Middle East peace package can be assembled, which
continually rips the process apart before it can be completed.
"It's easy to attack a compromise if you can't say, 'This is
what you get for it,' " Cavanaugh said. "I think President
Aliyev and President Kocharian want to frame a package so they can say
to their people, 'If you can accept these details, you get peace now.'
"