Though much merriment and tut-tutting arose from President Bush's
comments about having gazed into the depths of Russian President
Vladimir Putin's soul, Mr. Bush is far from the only policy-maker to be
taken with the keen-eyed former KGB agent. The front pages of newspapers
yesterday showed Mr. Putin in a passionate embrace with Chinese
President Jiang Zemin, celebrating the first Sino-Russian treaty of
"cooperation and friendship" between the two former communist
rivals since Mao and Stalin. Their meeting was said to have been
characterized by "effusive gestures of camaraderie." Such
bonhomie, such good cheer! It seems Mr. Putin is quite a charmer after
all. Though the signatories denied that the treaty was directed against
third countries, it is clear that the Russians are engaging in a little
triangulation of their own. The two leaders stated that they wanted a
"just and rational new international order." Of course, the
subtext here is the proposition that the international order is not just
or rational at present - when the United States is in a position of
international dominance.
It is too soon, however, to conclude that
a grand alliance is in the works. It is much more likely is that Mr.
Putin is deploying his considerable charms in several directions. Recent
meetings with European leaders such as German Chancellor Gerhard
Schroeder and French President Jacques Chirac, however, in which they
roundly condemned Russia's human rights record and crackdown on the
press, seem rather to have cooled the Russian leader's passion for the
European Union, which he was otherwise assiduously courting. In other
words, Mr. Putin's allegiances are fleeting and opportunistic.
The relationship between Russia and the
United States will be a focal point of the G-8 meeting in Genoa, Italy,
starting Friday. As National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice said in
her speech to the National Press Club last week, at their meeting in
Slovakia in June, "President Bush and President Putin initiated a
conversation about building a strategic framework that is post-Cold War
in substance, not just in rhetoric." The two are planning to build
on this framework, and on the initial rapport between them.
Mr. Putin also seems to have been a major
hit with the East- West Institute Task Force report on U.S.-Russia
policy, which came out Monday, "Toward the Common Good: Building a
New U.S.-Russian Relationship." The document is well-timed to
influence the debate over the future of the relationship and is the
latest in a long series of working papers on the subject emanating from
Washington think tanks in recent months.
In a meeting with reporters and editors
at The Washington Times on Monday, task force member and former senator
Alan Simpson was nothing less than colorful in his praise for the new
Russian president. In Mr. Simpson's view, Mr. Putin is Russia's last,
best hope, a man who means business, who does not beat about the bush,
who has put his heart and soul into a legislative reform agenda. He
allegedly also deeply appreciates the fact that Mr. Bush stuck by his
comments on the purity of Mr. Putin's soul when criticism came flying
fast and furious from politicians and media here at home. "If you
turn down this opportunity to work with the Russians," so Mr.
Simpson suggested in his uniquely homespun way, "you can come knock
on my box. I won't care, I'll be dead, but future generations will be
the losers." Mr. Simpson also proposed that skeptics who look at
Russian actions – as opposed to Russian rhetoric and charm – can
"kiss my gazoo." Interesting.
Now, the EastWest Institute's report is
not quite as gushing, but it still focuses on building trust and
cooperation between the two former rivals, a worthy cause provided that
inconvenient facts are addressed honestly and do not get swept under the
rug. "A new relationship between the U.S. and Russia could provide
the basis for creating new multilateral mechanisms that more effectively
address the problems posed by traditional as well as new threats, such
as terrorism, the proliferation of nuclear materials and weapons of mass
destruction, the spread of infectious diseases and narcotics
trafficking," the report says.
But what about the fact that Russia itself
is a weapons proliferator with its sales to Iran, Iraq and China? What
about the fact that Mr. Putin came into office talking about a
"dictatorship of laws"? Or the fact that under his regime, the
press has seen more rough treatment than at any time during the
presidency of Boris Yeltsin – or Mikhail Gorbachev for that matter? Or
the awful persecution of the Chechen people, whose cities have been
flattened by the Russians? Well, Mr. Simpson would like for all those
facts to find their way up the old gazoo as well.
One hopes that Mr. Bush and his team
remember the advice of President Reagan when dealing with the Soviets:
Trust, but verify.