LA
Times - 08.01.2001
Los
Angeles Times
The
Bad, Old U.N. Reappears
Karl
Marx famously said that history repeats itself--first as tragedy, second
as farce. The United Nations is dangerously toying with that notion.
On Aug. 31, the United Nations' World Conference Against Racism, Racial
Discrimination, Xenophobia and Related Intolerance is scheduled to take
place in Durban, South Africa. In the pre-conference planning, two
proposed resolutions have created an uproar and prompted the Bush
administration to consider boycotting the meeting.
One declaration states that Israel is "an apartheid, racist and
fascist state" that is conducting a new "holocaust"
against the Palestinians. Both the chair of the conference, Mary
Robinson, and Amnesty International have deplored this turn of events.
Robinson has observed, "If there is an attempt to revive the idea
of Zionism as racism we will not have a successful conference." It
was looking awfully reminiscent of the 1970s at the U.N., with dictators
freely bashing the United States, Israel and Western Europe for
historical and modern failures of democracy. But in a hopeful sign, 100
countries preparing for the conference are moving to expunge the most
blatant of the offending clauses, including attempts to downgrade the
Holocaust. With only Syria now said to be holding out, the chances that
rational debate will prevail are increasing.
The United Nations not so long ago was an echo chamber for denunciations
of wealthy democracies. One result was that the Reagan administration
refused to pay the U.N. dues the United States owed.
The "Zionism is racism" resolution was finally repealed in
1991, and Secretary-General Kofi Annan has raised the tone of debate and
helped remake the U.N. as a credible force for peace. This is reflected
in the fact that the United States has begun to pay its arrears. What
Annan has worked for would be jeopardized by the racism conference if
its organizers allowed the gathering to be hijacked on the Zionism
issue.
The White House is basing U.S. participation in the conference on
removal of the clauses directed against Israel. Even if the racism
clause is expunged, a push will probably still be made by the Arab
states to condemn Israel's settlement policy as genocidal. The knowledge
that the United Nations has better things to do these days than issue
incendiary declarations may yet rescue the conference.