ollowing
are excerpts from the joint news conference in Shanghai yesterday by
President Bush and President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia, as provided by
the White House:
PRESIDENT
PUTIN
The
consequences of the tragic events of Sept. 11 — political, economic,
psychological consequences — today are acutely felt in many countries
and in all the continents. I think nobody has doubts the unprecedented
carnage of the terrorists requires our united efforts, unification of
the efforts of international community to fight terrorism. And we
prepared and we issued a joint statement in this regard.
We
analyzed in detail the developments of the Russia-U.S. dialogue on
strategic stability issue. As you remember, during Genoa meeting, there
was an agreement to reach about joint work on strategic offensive and
defensive weapons, which are interrelated. And in our assessment, we
made progress here.
First of
all, it relates to Start issue. We reaffirmed our mutual intention to
reduce strategic offensive weapons. And now our task is to develop
parameters of such reductions and to design a reliable and verifiable
method to reduce nuclear arsenals of Russia and United States.
As for
the ABM-related issues, we also made some progress — at least, I
believe we do have understanding that we can reach agreements, taking
into account national interests of Russia, United States, and taking
into account the necessity to strengthen international stability in this
very important area. . . .
PRESIDENT
BUSH
It is
clear that President Putin understands the magnitude of the terrorist
threat. It is clear there's a lot the United States and Russia can do
together to defeat terrorism. The challenges and goals we share provide
an opportunity to rethink and renew a broader relationship.
Both our
nations are working to prevent proliferation and to reduce the threat
from cold war weapon stockpiles throughout the former Soviet Union.
We also
see progress in our efforts to build a new strategic framework. Today we
discussed significantly lowering offensive nuclear weapon arsenals,
within a framework that includes limited defenses, defenses that are
able to protect both our lands from political blackmail, from potential
terrorist attack. Both our nations must be able to defend ourselves
against the new threats of the 21st century, including long-range
ballistic missiles.
The
events of September the 11th make it clearer than ever that a cold war
ABM treaty that prevents us from defending our people is outdated, and I
believe dangerous. Economic cooperation and progress will be an
important part of our new relationship. With the right incentives and a
firm commitment to rule of law, there is no question in my mind a new
class of entrepreneurs can grow and flourish in Russia. And there's no
question in my mind that American businesses and American investment can
foster that trend. . . .
Q. Sir,
your communiqué did not mention the war in Afghanistan, and several
leaders at this meeting have urged America to end the conflict quickly.
What do you intend to do to cure this queasiness about your military
initiative? And to President Putin, do you agree with President Bush
that the ABM, post-Sept. 11, is dangerous to the world? . . .
MR. BUSH
I think I listened to probably three or four hours of discussions about
our campaign against terrorism. And there was a very strong support for
our activities — strong support for sharing intelligence, strong
support for the diplomatic front we're waging, strong support to disrupt
the financial operations of the terrorists, and strong support for our
military operations in Afghanistan.
The
people who came to this conference came because they wanted to show the
world that they were not afraid of terrorists. They weren't going to let
terrorists disrupt an important meeting. They also came to stand with
solidarity with the United States. . . .
MR. PUTIN
I would like to tell a couple of words about the first question. First
of all, I fully agree with the position of President Bush, and I believe
that his action was measured and adequate to the threat that the United
States was confronted with.
It's
first. Second, and it is very important for everybody to know, if we
started fighting terrorism, it should be completed, because otherwise,
terrorists might have an impression that they are not vulnerable. And in
that case, their actions would be more dangerous, more insolent, and
would result in worse consequences.
As for
the ABM Treaty of 1972, our position is well known, and I can reproduce
it once again. We believe it is an important element of stability in the
world. But we agree, and I said it several times, that we should think
about the future. . . .
Q. Did
you tell Mr. Putin that you would begin the process of withdrawing from
the ABM Treaty by the end of the year? And did you give him a figure on
missile cuts?
MR. BUSH
Let's see — no, to the second. Let me be a little more expansive. I
told Mr. Putin that we are in the process of analyzing our nuclear
arsenal, and that I intended to fulfill a campaign process, which was
that we were going to reduce our nuclear arsenal to a level that would
help maintain the peace, on the one hand; on the other hand, that would
also represent the realities of the 21st century.
Secondly,
I reiterated exactly what I told Vladimir in Slovenia — that I felt
like the ABM Treaty was outmoded and outdated, and it was time for us to
see if we couldn't work together to move beyond the ABM Treaty.