RFE/RL -
12.13.2001
Radio
Free Europe/ Radio Liberty
2001 In
Review: Russian Foreign Policy Brings Moscow Closer To West
By
Jeremy Bransten
Thanks to
a combination of unforeseen circumstances and skilled statesmanship,
Russian President Vladimir Putin has guided his country's foreign policy
through a string of successes in the past 12 months. Still regarded with
suspicion by both the United States and Europe at the start of the year,
Russia ends 2001 as a potential strategic partner to both. RFE/RL
correspondent Jeremy Bransten traces this stunning transformation.
Prague,
13 December 2001 (RFE/RL) -- The year opened frostily for U.S.-Russian
relations, with U.S. National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice
declaring in January that Russia "constitutes a threat to the West
in general" and to America's "European allies in
particular."
The
director of the Central Intelligence Agency, George Tenet, in hearings
before the U.S. Senate's Select Intelligence Committee, echoed those
comments: "Let me be perfectly candid. There can be little doubt
that President Putin wants to restore some aspects of the Soviet past
status as a great power, strong central authority, and a stable and
predictable society -- sometimes at the expense of neighboring states or
the civil rights of individual Russians."
But by
year's end, U.S. President George W. Bush was hosting Putin at his Texas
ranch, declaring the Russian leader to be a close friend: "We had a
great dinner last night. We had a little Texas barbecue, pecan pie, a
little Texas music, and I think the president really enjoyed
himself."
The two
leaders were still unable to overcome some points of contention -- among
them, Washington's impending departure from the Anti-Ballistic Missile
Treaty -- but a sea-change in attitude has taken place on both sides.
Bush
announced that the United States would cut its nuclear arsenal over the
next decade by two-thirds, from just under 6,000 warheads to between
1,700 and 2,200. Putin pledged to reciprocate. Earlier, Putin had
announced Russia would close its intelligence listening post in Cuba and
let the lease expire on its naval base in Vietnam. As for the old
bugbear of NATO expansion, which Russia had hitherto opposed, Putin said
he could see Moscow joining the alliance at a later date.
What
caused this dramatic turnaround? The initial breakthrough appeared to
come during the first face-to-face meeting between the two leaders in
Slovenia, in June. Bush, at that time, spoke of the need to end the
suspicion of the Cold War era and said Putin was a man he could trust.
But
without a doubt, the defining moment in Russian-American relations came
in the wake of the 11 September attacks on the United States. As Bush
has often repeated, Putin was the first foreign leader to telephone him
on that fateful day, to offer his country's assistance.
Putin's
immediate decision to publicly and wholeheartedly support the U.S. war
on terrorism has won him much mileage in Washington and could do more to
advance the cause of U.S.-Russian relations than years of talks and
treaties.
But
Putin's stance has also advanced Moscow's ties with its European
partners. During a visit to Berlin just two weeks after the U.S.
attacks, German Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder seemed to accept Moscow's
call for a new partnership, as well as Putin's interpretation of
Russia's ongoing military campaign in the breakaway republic of
Chechnya.
Schroeder
implied it was time for the West to soften its criticism of the action
in Chechnya as it, too, was directed against terrorism: "Regarding
Chechnya, there will be and must be a more differentiated evaluation in
world opinion."
Otto
Latsis, deputy editor of the Russian daily "Noviye Izvestia,"
recently told RFE/RL he believes Putin is gambling on a new overall
framework for relations with the West. If Putin's vision is accepted,
Latsis says, agreements on specific issues can be resolved later.
"I
think that this wager on an overall change in Russia's whole system of
relations with the West is a wager that Russia will become the same part
of the Western world as Germany, France, Britain -- that it will become
like any other large Western country," Latsis said.
But
Stephan De Spiegeleire, a Russia analyst at the RAND Europe think tank,
told RFE/RL that both sides may be getting ahead of themselves in their
enthusiasm to forge new ties.
"I'm
one of these people who thinks that foreign policy shouldn't run ahead
too much of economic realities and of political realities. And it seems
to me that this is exactly what is happening now," said De
Spiegeleire. "Russia is engaging more and more with the West, but
it's not nearly as close to the West that it would warrant the type of
institutional rapprochement that we're heading towards now, both with
respect to relations with NATO but also with the EU -- the fact, for
instance, that Russia now has an arrangement whereby every month they
get briefed by this new political and security committee of the European
Union. That's something that we don't even do with the United
States."
The other
concern, according to De Spiegeleire, is that Putin may be getting ahead
of his own supporters in Russia. After an initial honeymoon period when
no voices of opposition to his policies could be heard, the Russian
president now finds himself the target of criticism from some powerful
domestic interests. If Putin's new policy of rapprochement with the West
fails to yield tangible results, De Spiegeleire says it could become a
convenient stick in the hands of Putin's opponents.
"The
thing that really sort of worries me is that if I read the Russian press
and even some of the commentaries of some of the more liberal parts of
the foreign policy establishment, they're quite critical of what's
happening. So that to me suggests that Putin really has to be very
careful," De Spiegeleire said. "Now, to look at Russia, put
that against the background of what's happening domestically, where for
the first time it seems to me Putin is really encountering real
resistance on a number of issues and from a number of different angles:
certain business leaders being unhappy with him; the regional leaders
coming back and saying, 'Wait a second, you've gone too far'; the
military being unhappy about a variety of different things, going from
the sacking of the Northern Fleet command to military reform to some
financial issues. Even the power structures, which were traditionally
one of the main pillars of the new Putin political structure, like the
ministry of the interior, the judicial system -- even these people are
starting to think, 'Wait a second. What's happening here?' "
Both
sides in this new East-West relationship are testing the waters --
seeing how far they can extend cooperation. In December, NATO foreign
ministers meeting in Brussels agreed to set up a new forum for closer
cooperation with Russia, but planned to limit the decision-making power
offered to Russia.
The
ministers agreed to create a council for consultation and joint
decisions between the 19 NATO members and Russia. But NATO
Secretary-General Lord George Robertson underlined NATO's right to
bypass Russia if necessary. De Spiegeleire says that in the upcoming
year, the limits of this new entente may become better-defined. Both
sides will have to keep cool heads in order to avoid the ups and downs
of the 1990s, which began with enthusiasm on both sides and ended with a
degree of estrangement.
"There
is quite a bit of political capital that is being invested in this new
relationship, both on the Russian side and on the Western side. All I am
trying to say, though, is that there are still a lot of forces of
opposition on both sides that may make it very hard to fulfill the
promises of this new relationship," he said. "And if these
promises do not get fulfilled, we may actually be in a worse position
than we were at the beginning, because there will be mutual
recriminations, as indeed we've probably seen during the '90s. It might
be similar to that."
As the
saying goes, a year is a long time in politics. And 2002 could be
pivotal in determining whether this honeymoon between Russia and the
West will dissolve or grow into a solid strategic relationship.